On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 8:27 AM, Jason Haar <jason.h...@trimble.co.nz> wrote:
> This is a great topic! Is this been discussed at the IETF level? This is > much bigger than SA. From the sounds of this thread, spam under ipv6 is > going to be almost an *infinitely* bigger problem than ipv4. What about The IETF is where it's coming from (the ASRG mailing list, to be more precise). I just pointed to the discussion here on the SA list because SA will most likely be a prime "user" of whatever new protocols / designs being RFCed. As far as I could follow the discussion, I have the feeling that there is 1) some common understanding of the issues (sheer size of the IP space, which makes it hard to manage data in regular operations, and even more so when confronted with intentional or unintentional abusive behavior), and 2) some common understanding of the solution space (from "make everything new" via "pimp up the protocol" to "do not change anything and hope for the best", with most arguments centering around the middle ground). Thanks for all your arguments. -- Matthias
