On 3.1.2011 20:44, Andrzej Adam Filip wrote: > Jari Fredriksson <ja...@iki.fi> wrote: >> On 3.1.2011 20:13, Andrzej Adam Filip wrote: >>> Jari Fredriksson <ja...@iki.fi> wrote: >>>> On 3.1.2011 18:33, Bowie Bailey wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I've been using zen.spamhaus.org as an MTA blacklist for quite a while >>>>> now. Works great. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Many have said this. Thanks to all who replied, I have settled to zen. >>> >>> As I understand "limit of free queries" is sufficient for your server, >>> is not it? >>> >> >> I don't know what you mean... >> >> The actual purpose of my server is it provide service to a dropped, >> earlier domain of ours, it transfers all email to the new domain. >> x...@olddomain -> x...@newdomain. >> >> The old domain collects much spam, and it is not what we use daily. But >> still the old domain must be served. >> >> I have implemented greylisting to the old domain now, as well. Not for >> the new domain, but old. Just trying to get rid of the spam of the old >> domain... > > See point 3 below: > > http://www.spamhaus.org/organization/dnsblusage.html > <quote> > Use of the Spamhaus DNSBLs via DNS queries to our public DNSBL servers > is free of charge if you meet all three of the following criteria: > 1) Your use of the Spamhaus DNSBLs is non-commercial*, > and > 2) Your email traffic is less than 100,000 SMTP connections > per day, and > 3) Your DNSBL query volume is less than 300,000 queries > per day. > </quote> >
I still do not understand what you mean. I have read that, and we qualify with those terms. We are a commercial company, but we do not sell antispam. We use this to our own email. Our traffic is less than 100,000 SMTP connections per day, and our DNSBL query volume is less that 300,000 queries per day. We are a software/consulting company with 5 people onboard. -- Don't feed the bats tonight.
