On Mon, 2010-12-27 at 11:14 -0600, Jack L. Stone wrote:
> At 11:43 PM 12.26.2010 +0100, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> > > Guess I'm the only one with this issue or was it an ignorant question?
> >
> > Guess you're a little bit impatient, bumping your question after 24
> > hours, given the date and it being holiday season for quite a few folks
> > on this list... ;)
>
> You must be really busy minding everyone's business.
>
> If you don't know an answer, then let things pass. The other members can
> take care of themselves I suspect.
You could have read it as "no, I don't think that was an ignorant
question", answering your follow-up question -- not admonishing you in
any way. Unless that was purely rhetorical, and rather than getting it
answered, you really only meant to poke.
Anyway, thanks for eloquently showing off your attitude.
--
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu...@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
