Hi, I just upgraded to SA 3.3.1. Installed the rules using sa-update => ls /var/lib/spamassassin/ 3.003001
And I fed a message to SA using spamassassin -t < msg1. It gave me the following: Spam detection software, running on the system "xxxhost.tld", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: I just racked $465 in a few days doing almost nothing! I got it from - Business Week Journal friends help friends! I just racked $465 in a few days doing almost nothing! I got it from - Business Week Journal friends help friends! [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is freemail (mail[at]hotmail.com) -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [157.55.0.226 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 MIME_QP_LONG_LINE RAW: Quoted-printable line longer than 76 chars If it has been identified as spam, it means that it has a higher than 5.0 score. And it shows me 0. Also, when I am sending emails to myself I can see in the logs: amavis[10304]: (10304-02) Passed CLEAN, [xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx] <m...@host.com> -> <m...@company.com>, Message-ID: <20101209151005.701bd17b...@xxxhost.tld>, mail_id: zEaxTyKU4b-R, Hits: -, size: 354, queued_as: AF85417AEB6, 148 ms => Hits: - Being invoked through amavis. Slackware 12.0 Thank you. ________________________________ The information contained herein is intended for its addressee(s) only and it is privileged or otherwise confidential. Any unauthorized distribution, amendment or disclosure hereof is strictly forbidden by the law. Please find complete and translated versions at http://www.rompetrol.com/disclaimer.html
