On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 14:24, Bowie Bailey <bowie_bai...@buc.com> wrote: > On 11/8/2010 6:04 PM, Lawrence @ Rogers wrote: >> On 08/11/2010 12:06 PM, Ned Slider wrote: >>> >>> Fair enough - fortunately I've not seen any of those here so assumed >>> a genuine facebook mail had maybe slipped through into the corpus by >>> mistake. >>> >>> Either way, it was fixed by the time I'd spotted it. >> I've seen it as well, and disabled the Sought rules. They were causing >> too many FPs and not hitting enough spam to be worthwhile. > > I haven't seen a lot of false positives, but you're right that they are > not hitting much spam. > > I just checked my logs for the past two weeks and the Sought rules have > hit on just over 1% of my spam. They used to be the top rules in my > list. What happened?
Sorry about that -- basically, I haven't had any time recently to curate my mail corpora. I suspect sought is now building from old data and I hadn't noticed.... --j.
