On 10/18, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: > Ahem. Let us do this the other way round. *Why* do you believe this is > warranted, *why* do you believe our mass-check contributors might have > their internal and trusted networks set up incorrectly? This is crucial.
I'm not confident there is a problem. The possibility occurred to me and I thought I'd ask that it be checked. > Mass-check contributors are handpicked. We do *not* accept any result, > unless we believe we can trust the contributor. Of course. Do you think it's not worth checking? -- "I finally figured out the only reason to be alive is to enjoy it." - Rita Mae Brown http://www.ChaosReigns.com
