also, won't whitelisting her address open her up for spoofing? thanks for the scores. Now would that just go into /usr/local/share/spamassassin/50_scores.cf? and why would that score be missing.
Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote: > > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: njjrdell [mailto:nruggi...@dellmagazines.net] >> Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 11:32 AM >> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org >> Subject: Re: DOS_OE_TO_MX >> >> >> I'm pretty sure she would not send a GTUBE. Here is another from her >> >> Sep 28 08:35:26 nsmail spamd[207]: prefork: child states: II\n >> Sep 28 08:35:55 nsmail spamd[287]: spamd: connection from localhost >> [127.0.0.1] at port 50098\n >> Sep 28 08:35:55 nsmail spamd[287]: spamd: checking message >> <000b01cb5f6e$b1bbfe80$6629a...@traci> for (unknown):500\n >> Sep 28 08:35:55 nsmail spamd[287]: spamd: identified spam (4006.3/5.0) >> for >> (unknown):500 in 1.0 seconds, 142218 bytes.\n >> Sep 28 08:35:55 nsmail spamd[287]: spamd: result: Y 4006 - >> AWL,BAYES_50,DATE_IN_FUTURE_12_24,DOS_OE_TO_MX >> scantime=1.0,size=142218,user=(unknown),uid=500,required_score=5.0,rhost=l >> ocalhost,raddr=127.0.0.1,rport=50098,mid=<000b01cb5f6e$b1bbfe80$6629a...@t >> raci>,bayes=0.483846,autolearn=no\n >> >> >> I never seen anything with such a score of 4006. DOS_OE_TO_MX is the rule >> that is consistent, so I was hoping to find out where it is to make sure >> nothing is scored wrong > > score DOS_OE_TO_MX 2.602 3.086 2.265 2.523 > > > -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/DOS_OE_TO_MX-tp29839497p29840133.html Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
