On Sat, 2010-09-25 at 01:07 +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: > On Fri, 2010-09-24 at 17:31 -0500, Chris wrote: > > Here's what rules hit in a short circuit ham: > > > > X-spam-status: No, score=-124.2 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_PBL=3.335, > > RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL=0.001,SC_NET_HAM=-20,SHORTCIRCUIT=-100, > > USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5 RCVD_IN_PBL,RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL,SC_NET_HAM, > > SHORTCIRCUIT,USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL shortcircuit=ham > > Ham!? PBL, SORBS DUL. Are you trying to use whitelisting to protect > outgoing messages? Shouldn't you be using authenticated SMTP instead?
No Karsten, this is incoming mail to my machine. I don't run a server, this is straight from my ISP, picked up with fetchmail and processed through procmail. > Oh, and... Do you DKIM sign mail before scanning it with SA? No, as you can see here, my ISP adds the DKIM signature. http://pastebin.com/LqVtvjgM -- Chris KeyID 0xE372A7DA98E6705C
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
