On Mon, 06 Sep 2010 17:03:02 +0200 Karsten Bräckelmann <guent...@rudersport.de> wrote:
> Since you mentioned procmail, your spamc calling recipe is *with* > locking, right? Limiting concurrent SA processes pretty much to one as > far as filtering is concerned. And start spamd with --max-children=1. That not only frees up processes, but with --max-conn-per-child=3 it avoids frequently replacing the "hot child" with a paged-out spare.
