On Tue, 2010-08-10 at 10:51 +0200, Andreas Dunkl wrote:
> Am 09.08.2010 18:17, schrieb Karsten Bräckelmann:
> 
> > That commercial application running on box B uses different options with
> > spamc. If it adds the returned string as headers, it is broken.
> 
> Ooook, i got the Point.
> 
> Thx for your Input.

Well, that one paragraph isn't a good summary of my point. ;)

By detailed in-line comments explaining all your findings, I was showing
that the problem spamc on box B (if it is spamc), is using some options
that are not standard. As pointed out, these options are either
explicitly added when calling spamc, or are placed in the site config
spamc.conf file.

It might be worth digging up where these options are set on your box,
and correct them.


-- 
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu...@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}

Reply via email to