On Thu, 2010-07-22 at 12:55 -0700, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
> The truth is that ETRN is the way your supposed to do this kind of 
> thing, fetchmail is a hack.  But even ETRN is not as good as your
> own server.
> 
And fetchmail is fairly buggy. When I was using it I found that if it
got interrupted, e.g. by a remote MTA timeout toward the end of a
session, it would leave a left a lot of mail on the remote MTA that it
had already fetched but could never be persuaded to delete, probably
because it saves up all its purges until the bitter end of the session. 

IMO getmail is a lot better solution. It never does fetchmail's
abandoned mail trick and, after about a year's use, I haven't found any
other problems with it.


Martin


Reply via email to