corpus.defero wrote: > Uceprotect has some strange listing policies that have been questioned > numerous times. But the crux of it is this, the people who use > UCEProtect are well aware of it - and it's not widely used. Personally > it's one of those lists I don't trust to block at an SMTP level, but > will include a score shifter on a hit.
Same here. Wrt how widely UCEPROTECT is used, I'm not so sure. Any list that pops up in discussion every so often must be used quite a bit. After all, if nobody used it, no discussion. /Per Jessen, Zürich
