Only BT can request that delisting, sorry, but you are wasting your time. On Tue, 2010-04-20 at 14:40 +0100, Nigel Frankcom wrote:
> On 20 April 2010 14:13, corpus.defero <corpus.def...@idnet.com> wrote: > > On Tue, 2010-04-20 at 14:04 +0100, Nigel Frankcom wrote: > >> Hi All, > >> > >> Am I the only one incabale of figuring out the SORBS interface? > >> > >> I'm told by various mailserver that sorbs is blocking me (including > >> this list hence mailing from my gmail account). > >> > >> When I log on to sorbs, give my details I get a nice email back saying: > >> > >> $Id: Act.pm,v 1.16 2006/11/27 03:36:09 lem Exp $ > >> > >> I'm a robot writing you on behalf of the SORBS' admins. The reason > >> you're getting this automated response, is our desire to provide you > >> with consistent and fast responses. I'm prepared to correctly analyze > >> most of the cases appearing in the DUHL queue. > >> > >> You might want to keep your responses as short as possible (and to > >> trim my own responses) to help humans better serve you should the need > >> arise. > >> > >> > >> > >> I'm glad to report that the IP space will be submitted for delisting > >> from the DUHL. > >> > >> Best regards. > >> > >> SORBS > >> > >> It's now Day 6. and I'm still listed. > >> > >> If anyone has any ideas - please let me know? > >> > >> Kind regards > >> > >> Nigel > > > > Since when did the Spamassassin list become a place for people to bitch > > about SORBS ;-) > > > > The link is clear enough - get delisted/support here it is in case you > > can't see it amoungst all that clutter: > > > > http://www.au.sorbs.net/cgi-bin/support > > > > > > > > > 217.36.54.209 listed in the Dynamic IP Space (LAN, Cable, DSL & Dial Ups) > > Following your erudite link... that has been followed at least 4 times > before I get: > > $Id: Act.pm,v 1.16 2006/11/27 03:36:09 lem Exp $ > > I'm a robot writing you on behalf of the SORBS' admins. The reason > you're getting this automated response, is our desire to provide you > with consistent and fast responses. I'm prepared to correctly analyze > most of the cases appearing in the DUHL queue. > > You might want to keep your responses as short as possible (and to > trim my own responses) to help humans better serve you should the need > arise. > > > > I'm glad to report that the IP space will be submitted for delisting > from the DUHL. > > ...And I'm STILL in the damned list > > SORBS seems to have an issue, SORBS scores are used in SA - ergo it is > relevant to this list. > > Again, please, can someone offer a sensible suggestion as to how I > might resolve this problem. Or, a means of not disrupting SA lists, > and suggesting where I may find help relating to my particular issue. > > Nigel
