On lør 17 apr 2010 20:04:58 CEST, R-Elists wrote
i am asking for list archive reasons because you do not make it 100% clear
to those that dont havea clue
meta FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT_UNPAID (FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT &&
(SPF_PASS || DKIM_VALID))
score FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT_UNPAID -2.2
describe FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT_UNPAID Meta:
FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT hit on gmail, so unscore it
and the rule in sa can be writed like something to benefit from this
so legit domains can use username-part without hitting this rule, but
if if not signed with dkim/spf then hit
or another way is to just not whitelist that sender and have dkim/spf
do there work
if not spam whitelist_dkim the specifik sender
--
xpoint http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
