Dennis B. Hopp began:
>>> I received the following e-mail   http://pastebin.com/JXr9buxi
>>>
>>> It had a total score of 4.973 (blocked at 5).  [...] it hit:
>>>
>>> KHOP_RCVD_TRUST=-1.75,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-0.5,SPF_PASS=-0.001

Michael Scheidell responded:
>> is that an old rule? i just checked SA updates, and I don't see
>> that rule in current SA 3.3.1
>> 
>> so, who is KHOP?  I looked in rule sets and don't know them.
>> were these rules inherited form some outside trusted source?

KHOP is short for khopesh (or khopis), which are my handles.

I've quite purposefully left rules like KHOP_RCVD_TRUST and other
adjustors out of subversion despite that the lion's share of the
khop-* channels' content is.  This is because they would radically
change the way that SpamAssassin scores things (for the better in my
opinion, but that will cause some level of debate that I don't have
the time to participate in at the moment).

The gist of KHOP_RCVD_TRUST and its companion KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST, the
former of which was well summarized by Greg, is simple:  Give a boost
to non-overlapping* whitelisted relays that provide assurance against
spoofing and reduce the trust factor on whitelisted relays that lack
it.  (* if it's already listed in multiple relay whitelists, there's
no need to help the negative score.)

Trust within whitelists is (in my opinion) is a little too strongly
placed, especially given how much harder it is to remove a whitelisted
relay from a DNS-whitelist than it is to remove a blacklisted relay
from a DNSBL.  Furthermore, any sender who goes to the trouble of
getting on a DNS-whitelist is probably also going to set up SPF or
DKIM to assure users against spoofing, which means they'll hit
KHOP_RCVD_TRUST and not its companion.

Dennis B. Hopp then wrote:
> http://khopesh.com/wiki/Anti-spam#sa-update_channels
> 
> Some of his rules I believe have been incorporated into mainline 
> sa. I'm using 3.3.1. I just got an update from some of the KHOP 
> channels yesterday so they appeared to be maintained.

Yes, some of my channel's rules have found their way into the 3.3
branch, specifically DEAR_EMAIL, HELO_NO_DOMAIN, and TWO_IPS_RCVD.

It took me a while to dig through SA3.3 and clean up my rules to play
nice with it, and I've been busy on other projects so the channels
only got minor updates as they worked pretty well.

Since khop-sc-neighbors is an automatically updated channel, it been
updated continuously during this period.  As noted in bug 6114 and bug
6390, I've recently finished rigging unattended automatic svn checkins
so that it is up to date for masscheck, too.

Reply via email to