On lør 13 mar 2010 02:14:02 CET, Michelle Konzack wrote
The roblem is, accourding to the RFCs, ISP must have an <abuse> address, but do you have ever tried this with a corporated domain? Even <postmaster> is rejected on most domains.
report them on rfc-ignorant.org
Ome tim ago we had a problem on a bnch of Debian mailinglists with a <persupermarket> and after the ISP was not responsive, I have spidered theire WHOLE Website for corporated E-Mail addresses and put any of them in the Cc: of my ABUSE autoresponder... which normaly forward this crap only to the right <abse> addresses...
this is only the webside owner, not his hoster
After geting arround 1800 spams over the Debian mailinglists which where multiplid by the factor 37 by me with a friendly text for the recipients to contact there collegous to stop theire spaming customer
way to go there
Arround 2 days later the offenting customers domain was offline after more then one year of spaming.
super
I think, my 37 x 1800 abuse mails have hit the nerv of someone!
corp with did no log scan
The problem is now, such idiots require heavy manual intervention.
from.pm solves it for me -- xpoint http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
