On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 12:41 +0000, Mike Cardwell wrote:
> On 08/03/2010 12:34, Brian wrote:
>
> > Is zen.spamhous.org new? Personally I'd check your spelling ;-)
>
> m...@haven:~$ host 1.0.0.127.zen.spamhous.org
> 1.0.0.127.zen.spamhous.org A 208.73.210.27
> m...@haven:~$ host 1.2.3.4.zen.spamhous.org
> 1.2.3.4.zen.spamhous.org A 208.73.210.27
> m...@haven:~$
>
> Wonder how many people that has tripped up in its time.
I wonder if Claus at UCEProtect registered that? Two things make me
wonder. First, he is said to be a cyber-squatter, but the clincher for
me is using 'zen.spamhous.org' results in a positive return and high
false positive rate
}}} GRIN {{{{
