On Tuesday, March 2, 2010, 1:16:17 AM, Jeremy Fairbrass wrote: > "ram" <r...@netcore.co.in> wrote in message > news:1267506187.16095.11.ca...@darkstar.netcore.co.in... >> http://www.spamhaus.org/dbl/ >> I think sa-folks would have this already in some URIBL rule. What are >> the scores you assign for a dbl positive hit ? >> >> I assume my current datafeed would already extend to data access on the >> dbl list. I will have to setup my rbldnsd before trying this out. >> >>
> The new Spamhaus DBL may not be used with current versions of SpamAssassin. > A new version of SpamAssassin will be released soon which adds support for > the DBL. Check out the DBL FAQ at > http://www.spamhaus.org/faq/answers.lasso?section=Spamhaus%20DBL which > explains why - as quoted below: > ************** > SpamAssassin 3.3.1 Upgrade *Required* > SpamAssassin 3.3.1 is due to be released shortly and should coincide with > the release of the DBL. SA 3.3.1 has new code for dealing specifically with > domain-only URI BLs such as the DBL. To use the DBL you must upgrade to > 3.3.1. SpamAssassin versions prior to 3.3.1 query URI blocklists for URIs of > both type domain "http://abc.domain.tld"; and IP "http://1.1.1.1";, however > DBL does not support IP queries; in fact it prohibits them. > DBL should not be used in versions of SpamAssassin prior to 3.3.1 because > older versions of SpamAssassin make both IP and text queries to URI > blocklists. The DBL supports only domain (text strings not dotted quads) > queries. Do not 'hack' versions of SpamAssassin prior to 3.3.1 to add DBL > support, for example by reusing a SURBL or URIBL configuration for DBL. You > risk wrongly flagging legitimate email if you make IP queries to the DBL. > ************** > Also check out the announcement at > http://www.spamhaus.org/news.lasso?article=655 which goes into further > detail on this new list. Please also see this bugzilla: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6335 Cheers, Jeff C. -- Jeff Chan mailto:je...@surbl.org http://www.surbl.org/
