> >> LuKreme wrote: > >>> Here's where spf is useful. > > > > On 25.02.10 15:31, Marc Perkel wrote: > >> Except that it breaks forwarded email.
> Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > > I have never seen any occurence of SPF breaking forwarding. On 26.02.10 09:46, Per Jessen wrote: > Really? Do you know which problem SRS was meant to address then? If > SPF doesn't break forwarding, surely we have no need for SRS. I have explained it many times, even in the mail you quote. I don't see reason to repeat that to people who can't / don't want to understand. The funniest anti-SPF anti-SRS argument at http://david.woodhou.se/why-not-spf.html was the "alternative" SES which was inspired by SRS. -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. If Barbie is so popular, why do you have to buy her friends?
