On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 11:11:47 -0600 (CST) David B Funk <dbf...@engineering.uiowa.edu> wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Feb 2010, RW wrote: > > > On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 08:05:10 -0800 (PST) > > John Hardin <jhar...@impsec.org> wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 22 Feb 2010, RW wrote: > > > > > > > Why does T_FROM_MISSPACED score 0.0, when it's score isn't > > > > defined? > > > > > > Rounding. The actual defined score is 0.01, so it rounds down when > > > reported. > > > > but where is it defined? greping under /var/db/spamassassin for > > T_FROM_MISSPACED doesn't find a score line. > > SA has some special rule naming conventions. > > Rules that begin with the letters "T_" (EG T_FROM_MISSPACED) are so > called testing rules and automagically assigned a score of 0.01 > (enough to show up in the report but not enough to cause false > positives in case they're not right). The idea is that once the > author is happy with the way the rule works it's name will be changed > (remove the 'T_') and a proper score assigned. I'm aware of __* rules, but I'd not noticed T_* rules before. And looking back through my spam I don't see any hits until a couple of weeks ago, so presumably something has changed.
