On Tue, 2010-02-16 at 14:10 -1000, Alexandre Chapellon wrote: > Le mardi 16 février 2010 à 23:54 +0000, Martin Gregorie a écrit : > > Where's the problem? You'll need to write some code to interpret SA's > > spam markers anyway, so it can easily add a log message to maillog. Then > > its trivial to extend logwatch to scan the maillog and generate messages > > to spamiferous users. > Believe me I can't. If I reject mail, user have to be informed when I > do it and not even 12 hours after. > Surely that depends on the customer? For a normal customer (private, small company) a once a day reminder about spam may be good enough.
Remember that undeliverable mail can and does get returned up to 4-5 days later. > I have governemental customer, and they are really... demanding. > If you normally configure your routers to block direct connections via port 25 you can equally configure the router to allow large or demanding customers with static IPs to use direct connections but you should make it quite clear that they are then responsible for their own outbound spam filtering and inbound filtering too, on the grounds that you don't want to be responsible for FPs interfering with their business. Martin 1) > > > > > > Martin > > > > >
