Hi SA peeps,
I noticed that I was triggering
"RCVD_IN_PBL,RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL,RDNS_DYNAMIC" when sending mail through
my own spamassassin, which is spamassassin-3.2.5-2 from the fc10 repo,
configured via mimedefang and sendmail-milter.
I decided to try sending through my ISP's smtp server instead, and it
doesn't trigger the same rules, even though the content is the same, and
the client IP address is the same. I have posted the headers below, I
was hoping that someone could explain what the differences are that
trigger the rules on the first set of headers...?
This triggers;
Return-Path: <t...@limepepper.co.uk>
Received: from localhost.localdomain
(cpc3-seve11-0-0-cust606.popl.cable.ntl.com [82.10.154.95])
(authenticated bits=0)
by vs802.ecnow.co.uk (8.14.3/8.14.1) with ESMTP id o1GLrAwn032508
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
for <bad...@limepepper.co.uk>; Tue, 16 Feb 2010 21:53:12 GMT
Message-ID: <4b7b13d3.8090...@limepepper.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 21:53:23 +0000
From: Tom H <t...@limepepper.co.uk>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5)
Gecko/20091209 Fedora/3.0-3.fc11 Lightning/1.0pre Thunderbird/3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: bad...@limepepper.co.uk
Subject: test
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0
OpenPGP: id=3B3F97D9
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 1.83 (*)
AWL,BAYES_40,HELO_LH_LD,RCVD_IN_PBL,RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL,RDNS_DYNAMIC
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.67 on 209.135.157.202
This one not;
Return-Path: <t...@limepepper.co.uk>
Received: from mtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (mtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com
[81.103.221.47])
by vs802.ecnow.co.uk (8.14.3/8.14.1) with ESMTP id o1GMDWHb002121
for <t...@limepepper.co.uk>; Tue, 16 Feb 2010 22:13:32 GMT
Received: from aamtaout04-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.35])
by mtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com
(InterMail vM.7.08.04.00 201-2186-134-20080326) with ESMTP
id
<20100216221344.qbig4204.mtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl....@aamtaout04-winn.ispmail.ntl.com>
for <t...@limepepper.co.uk>; Tue, 16 Feb 2010 22:13:44 +0000
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([82.10.154.95])
by aamtaout04-winn.ispmail.ntl.com
(InterMail vG.2.02.00.01 201-2161-120-102-20060912) with ESMTP
id
<20100216221344.behr22934.aamtaout04-winn.ispmail.ntl....@localhost.localdomain>
for <t...@limepepper.co.uk>; Tue, 16 Feb 2010 22:13:44 +0000
Message-ID: <4b7b1896.4060...@limepepper.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 22:13:42 +0000
From: Tom H <t...@limepepper.co.uk>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5)
Gecko/20091209 Fedora/3.0-3.fc11 Lightning/1.0pre Thunderbird/3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: t...@limepepper.co.uk
Subject: test
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0
OpenPGP: id=3B3F97D9
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=1ggfb5FlKZQUfF3vzm9UBYZ2uTfLsbs/8dSljwg5+mE= c=1
sm=0 a=nS36O97Bj3wUElCrIrAA:9 a=WSUfejPYnVaDIwHsvJh5HpFP3bwA:4
a=HpAAvcLHHh0Zw7uRqdWCyQ==:117
X-Spam-Score: 0.175 () AWL,BAYES_00,TVD_SPACE_RATIO
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.67 on 209.135.157.202
Thanks,
Tom
