On Sun, 2010-02-14 at 18:18 -0800, the Nabble user [email protected] once again replied off-list: > config files included show how the mail is flowing. > > Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: > > Nabble allows off-list replies, and apparently even makes it easy to > > use? WTF, shouldn't the default be list reply, and anything else > > guarded by serious confirmation dialogs? > > > > Awesome, and it even breaks threading. How utterly annoying. > > > > Please keep the thread on-list, replying to the list. Do not reply to > > the sender, unless you got a good reason and *really* mean to.
Wow, you did it again. DO NOT REPLY OFF-LIST, even less so from Nabble! Obviously, you didn't even care to read my post carefully before replying with no additional information. With such an attitude, I am not going to waste my time on you. End of thread for me. > Quoted from: > http://old.nabble.com/Outbound-SPAM-filter-tp27578583p27587528.html Sic. -- char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu...@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4"; main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1: (c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
