On Sun, 17 Jan 2010, Benny Pedersen wrote: : spamassassin 2>&1 -D --lint | less : is this line not a FAQ by now ?
I just tried this, for curiosity's sake, and was surprised to discover that a couple of my meta rules had simple typos that showed up like this in the 'debug' output (3.2.5): [28424] dbg: rules: meta test LOC_RULE2 has undefined dependency 'LOCRULE1' ...the 'bug' being nothing more than a missing underscore in 'LOC_RULE1'. But this does NOT appear on the standard (without -D) --lint output? Is this by desgin? A bug? I notice some default rules also have this dependency issue. So I'm not sure I would want --lint to 'fail' on this, but still it surprised me to see an obvious syntax error 'overlooked' by the basic --lint without any hint it was happening.... Thoughts? - Charles
