On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 5:12 PM, Matt Kettler <mkettler...@verizon.net>wrote:
> On 1/5/2010 8:03 PM, Julian Yap wrote: > > Previously I was running SpamAssassin-3.1.8_1 on FreeBSD. > > I recently upgraded to 3.2.5_4. > > It's seems now, I never get any hits on the rule ALL_TRUSTED. > > Previously it seemed like SA was doing some kind of dynamic evaluation > which was working well. > > - Julian > > is NO_RELAYS or UNPARSEABLE_RELAY also hitting? > > In older versions of SA, ALL_TRUSTED was really implemented as "no > untrusted", so it would fire off if there were no relays, or no parseable > ones. This caused problems with ALL_TRUSTED matching spam when people ran SA > on servers with malformed headers. > > Later we changed it to fire if there is: > -at least one trusted relay > -no untrusted relays > -no unparseable relays. > > Which might be the cause of your problem. > NO_RELAYS gets no hits but UNPARSEABLE_RELAY is working. Should I be getting some hits on NO_RELAYS? Thanks for the further explanation. - Julian
