Can we call this the "Y2010" bug? :)
I was just thinking back 10 years ago today wondering if there would be
a 2010 related date bug.
Charles Gregory wrote:
Holy ########!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I am SO glad that I read my e-mail first thing this morning!
THANKS for spotting this!
- Charles
On Fri, 1 Jan 2010, Mike Cardwell wrote:
I just received some HAM with a surprisingly high score. The following
rule triggered:
* 3.2 FH_DATE_PAST_20XX The date is grossly in the future.
Yet the date header looks fine to me:
Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 00:46:45 GMT
In /usr/share/spamassassin/72_active.cf I find:
header FH_DATE_PAST_20XX Date =~ /20[1-9][0-9]/ [if-unset: 2006]
Doesn't look particularly sane to me... I have given that rule a score
of 0 in my local.cf for now.
--
Mike Cardwell - IT Consultant and LAMP developer
Cardwell IT Ltd. (UK Reg'd Company #06920226) http://cardwellit.com/
Technical Blog: https://secure.grepular.com/blog/
