Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: On Sun, 6 Dec 2009, Benny Pedersen wrote:i think it could be added to freemail.pm to test if sender domain have spf or dkim and if no spf and or no dkim consider it as a freemail domain ?On 07.12.09 12:23, Charles Gregory wrote:Nope. I run an ISP and basically my SPF amounts to 'neutral' because my users can send mail from any access anywhere in the world with our addresses on it (a situation that may change if I get SMTP-AUTH working). So unless SA differentiates between a *result* of 'neutral' and the simple absence of an SPF record, then our mail would be classified as 'free' by this logic, even though it is not....it does:score SPF_HELO_NEUTRAL 2.231 2.000 0.744 0.576 I have yet to find ANY use for SPF. And SPF causes nothing but problems. |
- freemail vs dkim / spf Benny Pedersen
- Re: freemail vs dkim / spf Michael Scheidell
- Re: freemail vs dkim / spf McDonald, Dan
- Re: freemail vs dkim / spf Henrik K
- Re: freemail vs dkim / spf Marc Perkel
- Re: freemail vs dkim / spf McDonald, Dan
- Re: freemail vs dkim / spf Charles Gregory
- Re: freemail vs dkim / spf Matus UHLAR - fantomas
- Re: freemail vs dkim / spf Marc Perkel
- RE: freemail vs dkim / spf R-Elists
- Re: freemail vs dkim / spf Marc Perkel
- Re: freemail vs dkim / sp... Matus UHLAR - fantomas
- Re: freemail vs dkim / spf Mike Cardwell