On 06.12.09 10:53, Per Jessen wrote: > Just for fun, I took a look at my logs for August, September, October > and November and looked at the hits on HABEAS_ACCREDITED_COI: > > Total hits = 1009. > > Of those, 45 would have been filtered out without HABEAS_ACCREDITED_COI. > > 5 were most probably backscatter and got filtered out despite > HABEAS_ACCREDITED_COI. > > 3 were blacklisted (by users). > > 565 had hits on HABEAS_ACCREDITED_COI and RCVD_IN_SSC_TRUSTED_COI. > 271 had hits on HABEAS_ACCREDITED_COI and RCVD_IN_IADB_LISTED. > > 705 were greylisted (which means that the sending client matched certain > criteria). > > 605 did not have a messageid.
imho this says that HABEAS_* rules should be present in some meta rules that could give us some benefits (according to proposed "2+2!=4" rule) -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. Boost your system's speed by 500% - DEL C:\WINDOWS\*.*
