On 11/30/2009 03:15 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > On 27.11.09 14:04, Philip A. Prindeville wrote: > >> for the ruleset: >> > >> header __L_UNDISCLOSED1 To:raw =~ /undisclosed-recipients: ;/ >> > just FYI, sendmail can be configured to do different things when To: is > missing - there's sendmail option NoRecipientAction, configured by setting > confNO_RCPT_ACTION m4 directive. The default value is "none" but e.g. Debian > was setting it to "add-to-undisclosed" which causes MISSING_HEADERS not > hitting (only from milter, which appears to be called before the headers are > "fixed"). > > Maybe you should look at your MTA's configuratioon options if it doesn't > cause different rules hitting/not hitting, e.g. sendmail adds Date: and > Message-Id headers which cause MISSING_DATE and MISSING_MID. I was not able > to find how disable this behaviour in sendmail. > >
Odd. This is on FC11: [r...@mail mail]# grep confNO_RCPT_ACTION /usr/share/sendmail-cf/*/* /usr/share/sendmail-cf/m4/proto.m4:_OPTION(NoRecipientAction, `confNO_RCPT_ACTION', `none') [r...@mail mail]# grep NoRecipientAction *.cf sendmail.cf:#O NoRecipientAction=none submit.cf:#O NoRecipientAction=none [r...@mail mail]# Added: define(`confNO_RCPT_ACTION', `none')dnl to the sendmail.mc, made sendmail.cf, did a service restart... will see what happens. I can't remember: if an option is commented, is that showing us the default value typically? -Philip
