I need the "full" mails to do that -- but with the uploaded mail, yes, I should do that! good point.
Right now, SOUGHT appears to be broken. I need to get to where the server is currently and fix it -- I don't have remote login to it at the mo :( On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 18:02, John Hardin <jhar...@impsec.org> wrote: > On Thu, 5 Nov 2009, Dave Pooser wrote: > >>> I think I remember hearing some discussion about that at one point. I >>> don't think that type of thing is as big of a concern here since these are >>> all body rules. I agree that you need a good corpus of ham to prevent FP's, >>> but I'm sure Justin is doing that. >> >> I'm sure he's working hard on it, but his ability is naturally going to be >> limited by his ham corpus. I just saw a whole bunch of legit AmEx corporate >> card updates get thrown into the quarantine bin due to hitting SOUGHT. It >> happens sometimes; I've found that when I send him a sample of the mistagged >> email he gets it fixed pretty quickly. > > I wonder if he's considered running the ham exclusion against the complete > nightly masscheck ham corpora...? > > -- > John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/ > jhar...@impsec.org FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org > key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79 > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > Men by their constitutions are naturally divided in to two parties: > 1. Those who fear and distrust the people and wish to draw all > powers from them into the hands of the higher classes. 2. Those who > identify themselves with the people, have confidence in them, > cherish and consider them as the most honest and safe, although not > the most wise, depository of the public interests. > -- Thomas Jefferson > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > 6 days until Veterans Day > > -- --j.
