On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 18:59 +0200, Lars Ebeling wrote:
> I am running SA 3.2.5 on HP-UX 11.11. I am using postfix as MTA.
> 
> http://pastebin.com/m612529a7
> 
> The interface is configured in master.cf


It's 42K, so check that you don't have a size limit.

When I scan it I get:

X-Spam-Report: 
        *  2.2 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in 
bl.spamcop.net
        *      [Blocked - see <http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?75.209.5.48>]
        *  0.5 RCVD_IN_PBL RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus PBL
        *      [75.209.5.48 listed in zen.spamhaus.org]
        *  2.9 RCVD_IN_XBL RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus XBL
        *  2.0 RCVD_IN_BRBL_RELAY RBL: received via a relay rated as poor by
        *      Barracuda
        *      [75.209.5.48 listed in b.barracudacentral.org]
        *  4.2 HELO_DYNAMIC_SPLIT_IP Relay HELO'd using suspicious hostname 
(Split
        *      IP)
        *  3.7 FH_HELO_ALMOST_IP Helo is almost an IP addr.
        *  0.0 RELAY_US Relayed through United States
        *  0.5 RAZOR2_CHECK Listed in Razor2 (http://razor.sf.net/)
        *  1.3 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E4_100 Razor2 gives engine 4 confidence level of
        *      100%
        *      [cf: 100]
        *  1.5 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E4_51_100 Razor2 gives engine 4 confidence level
        *      above 50%
        *      [cf: 100]
        *  0.5 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100 Razor2 gives confidence level above 50%
        *      [cf: 100]
        *  0.1 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to trusted network by host with
        *      dynamic-looking rDNS
        *  1.5 JM_SOUGHT_3 Body contains frequently-spammed text patterns
        *  0.5 BOTNET_OTHER BOTNET_OTHER


And it also is caught by clamav:
$ clamscan lars.vir
lars.vir: Sanesecurity.Malware.8825.UNOFFICIAL FOUND


> 
> 
> Regards
> 
> Lars
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Kevin Parris" <kpar...@ed.sc.gov>
> To: <users@spamassassin.apache.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 5:46 PM
> Subject: Re: Mail not scanned
> 
> 
> In this situation I believe Spock would say "Insufficient Data" . . .
> 
> What o/s are you running? What is your mail handling software?  How does 
> that mail handling software interface to SpamAssassin?  Are you sure the 
> items were not scanned, or are you simply bothered that they were not marked 
> as spam by the scan?  Have you placed a complete sample with all headers on 
> pastebin and given us the link to that so we can evaluate the message?
> 
> >>> "Lars Ebeling" <lars.ebel...@leopg9.no-ip.org> 10/21/09 11:40 AM >>>
> Why aren't mail from "United Parcel Service" scanned?
> 
> The last 24 hours have i got about 20 of them and none scanned.
> 
> 

Reply via email to