On Fri, 2009-10-09 at 11:40 -0700, Marc Perkel wrote:
> Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> > Maybe you really should read up on some docs, and actually have a look
> > at the stock rules, as well as some third-party rule-sets. Just to see
> > your "innovative" concept already in use. And maybe even understand
> > it...
> What I'm suggesting to a new structure of rules, done by the
> community, and combine phrases into concept and then combine those
> concepts into new rules that score. This can be done using the
> existing structure but rewriting a lot of rules and creating a new
> rule infrastructure.
This IS being done in a number of stock and third-party rule-sets. There
still is nothing new here.
The only -- albeit not new either -- thing you actually suggested in the
above paragraph, is to have volunteers. Feel free to.
--
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu...@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
