On 10/05/2009 11:27 AM, John Hardin wrote:
Warren:I guess that's an argument against anchoring CN_EIGHT at the beginning of the URI...
I wasn't the one that suggested anchoring. Did the old rule decode %2E%63%6E as .cn though? Warren
On 10/05/2009 11:27 AM, John Hardin wrote:
Warren:I guess that's an argument against anchoring CN_EIGHT at the beginning of the URI...
I wasn't the one that suggested anchoring. Did the old rule decode %2E%63%6E as .cn though? Warren