On 09/28/2009 01:32 PM, Marc Perkel wrote:
Warren Togami wrote:
On 07/09/2009 09:57 PM, Marc Perkel wrote:
For what it's worth I'm now ahead of Barracuda on Jeff Makey's blacklist
comparison chart. Not a scientific comparison but it's about all there
is to compare blacklists. Now only abuseat.org and spamhaus have me
beat. (apews doesn't count because they blacklist everything)
http://www.sdsc.edu/~jeff/spam/cbc.html
Hi Marc,
http://wiki.junkemailfilter.com/index.php/Spam_DNS_Lists#How_to_use_the_Lists
Have you considered adding your RCVD_IN_JMF* rules to the sandbox so
we can easily compute some statistics from the weekly net masschecks?
For example...
http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20090926-r819101-n/RCVD_IN_PSBL/detail
http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20090926-r819101-n/RCVD_IN_PSBL_2WEEKS/detail
http://psbl.surriel.com/
I've been following the weekly masscheck results on PSBL. The false
positives have helped us to identify problems in PSBL's trap filtering
logic and made it safer to use. The statistics are looking pretty good
now, so hopefully PSBL will become enabled by default in
spamassassin-3.3.0.
I'd be interested in how well it worked. Is there anything I need to do
to help?
1) I'm waiting to hear back what it will take for me to gain commit
access so I can add this to the sandbox.
2) Do you mind hundreds of thousands of rapid DNS lookups during
masschecks? If not then the two largest servers doing masschecks could
probably use rsync access to your data.
Warren Togami
wtog...@redhat.com
