On Sat, 2009-09-26 at 09:25 -0700, John Hardin wrote: > On Sat, 26 Sep 2009, Karsten Brckelmann wrote: > > > On Fri, 2009-09-25 at 11:37 -0700, John Hardin wrote: > > Another note which I've seen here before: Drop the [.,] for the host > > part of a uri rule. It's not a URI if it contains a comma, it'll be the > > dot. > > I was wondering about that, and assumed Guillaume included it because a > comma had actually appeared in spams. > > Guillaume, did "google,com" actually appear in spams? If not, why did you > include google[dot-or-comma]com in your rule?
Even if it did, you could only find those with a body rule, not a uri rule, since the parser won't pick up example,com as a uri. -- Daniel J McDonald, CCIE # 2495, CISSP # 78281, CNX www.austinenergy.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
