On Thu, 2009-09-24 at 12:51 +0100, RW wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 06:46:42 +0100
> "rich...@buzzhost.co.uk" <rich...@buzzhost.co.uk> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2009-09-23 at 23:36 +0100, RW wrote:
> > > On Wed, 23 Sep 2009 10:40:11 -0700 (PDT)
> > > linuxmagic <sa...@linuxmagic.com> wrote:
> > >
> >
> > > Incidently the point about backscatter is wrong. The traditional
> > > approach of classifying, and then discarding or filing to a spam
> > > folder, produces zero backscatter from spam. Backscatter is
> > > actually caused by rejecting at the SMTP level - when it's done on
> > > the wrong SMTP transaction.
> >
> > That is *not* correct.
>
> I clarified what I meant by that well before you posted.
Perhaps I missed a post? Can you remind me what you said?
Thanks.
