Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>> Matt Kettler <mkettler_sa <at> verizon.net> writes:
>>
>>> In theory, a feature could be added to let you do something like this
>>> (SA doesn't have this feature, but I'm proposing it could be added):
>>>
>
> On 22.09.09 11:46, ArtemGr wrote:
>
>> That would be a nice optimization: most of the spam we receive have a >10
>> score. It seems a real waste of resource to perform all the complex tests
>> (like distributed hashing or OCR-ing) on spam which is DNS and
>> rule-detectable.
>>
>
> You haven't read Matt's explanation of why it wasn't a good idea, did you?
>
> There are rules with negative scores, which can puch the score back to the
> ham, e.g. whitelist. Would you like to stop scoring before e.g. whitelist is
> checked?
>
*You* obviously haven't read my message, which explains how this *can*
be done safely.
