On 09/23/2009 12:58 PM, John Hardin wrote:
On Wed, 23 Sep 2009, Warren Togami wrote:
On 09/23/2009 12:36 PM, Jose Luis Marin Perez wrote:
3. Add SARE rules
Why is anyone still using SARE rules when they haven't been updated
for years?
Because they still get hits?
I get fairly good results on the SARE fraud rules, for example. They
aren't perfect, of course, and more leaks through as time passes, but
they are far from useless.
Maybe they can be retired once 3.3.0 ships.
http://khopesh.com/wiki/Anti-spam
After 3.3.0 ships I hoping I can get some of khopesh's rules into the
sandbox for testing. Talking to khopesh, he seems to be too busy to do
it himself.
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6114
These rules seem to be good, although they would need to be updated
frequently like JM's SOUGHT.
Perhaps it might be good if we think about a standardized mechanism for
frequently updated local-only rules that need frequent updates.
Warren Togami
wtog...@redhat.com
