On 23.09.09 10:40, linuxmagic wrote: > Slightly old thread, but we should clear any misconceptions. MagicSpam is > NOT anything like SpamAssassin. LinuxMagic has been developing Anti-Spam > solutions for the ISP and Telco markets for quite some time, focusing on the > SMTP transaction layer. This approach gives a more 'Zero Day' style > protection, as it can identify spam sources prior to accepting the email, > reducing backscatter and overhead. > > Mail Servers should have the protection during the SMTP transaction, and we > have been porting our technology to other mail servers which do not have > this ability. Our first ports were to Qmail style mail servers, and since > then we have ported to many others including Linux and Windows platforms. > > Just visit the forums, and see what customers have to say about this > product, as it speaks for itself. We have patent pending technology in > place, to provide for an especially unique methodology, and more > importantly, we make it very easy to install and operate. > > http://www.magicspam.com and http://forums.wizard.ca/viewforum.php?f=16
and where may I find some usefull info, except positive feedbacks in the forum and marketing bullsh*t on the page? > Aaron Wolfe wrote: > > > > On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 1:11 PM, <r...@unrealstyle.com> wrote: > >> Does anybody have any experience with this product? > >> > > > > It appears *noone* has any experience with it... Google finds only 2 > > links and they are on the company's own homepage. > > > >> My company wants to replace SpamAssassin with this product, due to > >> SpamAssassin being not being up to par other products. > > > > What is the evidence for this statement? I move customers from > > commercial solutions to my company's SA based filtering regularly and > > they are typically very impressed with what we can do for them with > > Spamassassin. > > > >> > >> My argument is that people we give SpamAssassin to have no clue how to > >> use > >> it and what it's designed to do, therefore they think it sucks. > >> > > > > Why would your users even need to know you are using SA? How are they > > supposed to "use" it? Just configure it to make spam go away and they > > should be OK with that. You can set up some sort of quarantine or > > tagging system but people generally aren't going to use it much. > > > >> > >> > >> > > > > From what I can find of the company behind this Magic thing, it looks > > like their products are repackaged open source software. (Their > > "MagicMail" product appears to be qmail). There's a pretty decent > > change they are selling you Spamassassin anyway :) -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. Due to unexpected conditions Windows 2000 will be released in first quarter of year 1901
