> On Sat, 2009-09-12 at 16:15 +0300, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
>>>
>>> I don't want the Bayes, but I'm not seeing any rules
>>> like this:
>>>
>>> 4.0 BOTNET Relay might be a spambot or
>>> virusbot
>>>
>>> This is a vanilla Spamassassin - but I'm surprised I'm
>>> not getting any score on these here.
>>
>> What's wrong with the bayes? It works for me.
>>
>> Botnet is a separate plugin.
>>
>>
> Bayes is going out of fashion. It's just as easy to make
> a bad one by bad training than a good one.
>
> I guess the core vanilla Spamassassin is failing to score
> this very well, and that the scores you have pasted here
> are mostly from plug-ins ?
Yes, Botnet, DCC and Razor2 are addons, as well as the extra rules from
sought.rules.yerp.org
saupdates.openprotect.com
90_sare_freemail.cf.sare.sa-update.dostech.net
that I use.
However, DCC and Razor2 work with vanilla SA if those separate applications are
installed on the machine.
