On Sat, 2009-08-29 at 10:15 -0700, an anonymous Nabble user wrote:
> Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> > tflags __COMMA multiple
> > meta __COMMA_4 __COMMA >= 4
>
> Works wonders. I chose three, and was almost inclined to score on just this
> rule, if it wasn't for people discussing Dave Dee, Dozy, Beaky, Mick & Tich
> :) It scores however on non-intended fudder like "Purify, Clense, Look
> Better, Feel Better" and a Google Reader hit.
That was an example, demonstrating the tflags multiple option with your
very request for "a rule that is able to count the number of comma's in
a subject".
I probably should have added that I didn't even look at your sample, but
merely explained how to do exactly what you asked for. :)
Yes, it is indeed likely prone to FPs on its own, unless very strictly
meta'ed for some special cases, and it actually also is likely bound to
expire soon. Obfuscation techniques like this usually are subject to
change, quite rapidly, and I'd bet you'll soon find yourself playing
whack-a-mole.
--
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu...@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
