> Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > > another serious question: should IPs with statically assigned IP > > addresses get the same processing as if they were dynamically > > assigned?
On 18.08.09 16:51, Per Jessen wrote: > Probably not, but there's no guaranteed way of telling them apart. there is - if they contain word 'static' or at least 'sta', they are, surprise, static... > > Of course it's much better to have personalised DNS name than generic > > one, but *DYNAMIC* should still not match, becausse the ip is just not > > dynamic. > How do you know that? know what? that a static IP is static? That's from definition. I know ISPs who use this static naming scheme. And if an ISP lies (I can't imagine other reason than being completely idiot), well, all their IPs will get blocked, thgey will get flooded by reports etc. -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. "The box said 'Requires Windows 95 or better', so I bought a Macintosh".
