> * Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uh...@fantomas.sk>: > > On 06.08.09 15:37, Marc Perkel wrote: > > > This might be an advanced concept for you but what I meant was - > > > deliberately send spam. Everyone doing sender verification is someone > > > who is trying to BLOCK spam, and therefore are the good guys. I also > > > track SAV calls and I use it as a WHITE list. > > > > How do you differ between people doing SAV and people sending backscatter?
On 07.08.09 15:35, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: > The former never enter the DATA stage, the latter do. Yes, but this can be done only when we come to the DATA phase, in which case it's very hard to reject without patched mailserver. He called backscatterer the worst blacklist, so I'm curious if he does differ between them somehow, or simply accepts backscatter and whitelists all IPs on backscatter blacklist because "SAV is good". -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. Nothing is fool-proof to a talented fool.
