On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 00:37 +0200, a...@exys.org wrote: > Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > > On 04.08.09 20:09, a...@exys.org wrote: > >> I have obviously never received any mail from that sender, so why does > >> it hit? > >> .... > in later mail you mention that you run SA before greylisting. .... If, for some (very) odd reason you run greylisting after SA then *of course* your host has (a) seen the mail and (b) passed it through SA. How else can the mail get to the greylister?
Would you care to explain why you put a greylister behind SA? Do you know how a greylister works and why it was designed to work that way? > nope. i grepped the global log. the only time that sender ever ocurs it > was temporary rejected due to greylisting. > And where else did greylisted mail appear in the log? For the mail to be logged as rejected by a greylister *after* its been through SA it must also have been inspected by AWL and therefore it did affect the AWL database. Martin
