Hi Damian -- Our first impression: somebody other than us is suing somebody other than us about a matter that may be entirely unrelated to anything we produce. Unless we have a specific reason to believe that a specific patent is likely to be enforced against either us or a downstream user (and, no, one generally can't glean that from the title) there is nothing we should do at this time.
Sorry about that.... --j. On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 19:59, Damian Mendoza<dam...@exceleratesoftware.com> wrote: > Anyone else being sued by Southwest Technology Innovations regarding spam > filtering? It’s odd that they would name my old company (Workgroup > Solutions) since they have very few installations (2 person reseller) > compared to the others named. Any opinions or feedback? > > > > http://www.faqs.org/patents/app/20090100138 > > > > Southwest Technology Innovations LLC v. St. Bernard Software, Inc. et al > > EasyEdit > > (What's this?) What is the EasyEdit button? This website gets better when > people like you add to it. Just click the EasyEdit button to start. (help) > > Last update: No updates (content history | content tools) (help) > > Keyword tags: None > > Plaintiff: > > Southwest Technology Innovations LLC > > Defendant: > > St. Bernard Software, Inc., Espion International, Inc., Workgroup Solutions, > Inc., Sonicwall, Inc., Mirapoint Software, Inc. and Proofpoint, Inc. > > > > Case Number: > > 3:2009cv01487 > > Filed: > > July 9, 2009 > > > > Court: > > California Southern District Court > > Office: > > San Diego Office [ Court Info ] > > County: > > San Diego > > Presiding Judge: > > Judge John A. Houston > > Referring Judge: > > Magistrate Judge Jan M. Adler > > > > Nature of Suit: > > Intellectual Property - Patent > > Cause: > > 35:271 Patent Infringement > > Jurisdiction: > > Federal Question > > Jury Demanded By: > > Plaintiff > > -- --j.
