> spamassassin 2>&1 -D --lint > > > > search here for missing perl modules
On 05.07.09 18:57, MySQL Student wrote: > How effective are razor/pyzor and SPF/DKIM? very effective, razor/pyzor altogether with DCC. SPF also helps much, although it should be implemented at SMTP level and refuse all messages that cause (hard) fail. While DKIM is currently in SA, the only place it currently applies is whitelisting, since it has scores of +/-0.001. Different scores were mentioned here, but not incorporated into SA scores yet. > I've always been a bit hesitant > to use any of those. Why? > and the spam mail have all_trusted ?, you trust a spammer in > > trusted_networks > > > trusted_networks isn't at all defined. It looks like it was previously > defined with just 127.0.0.1, but it's now commented out. What should it be? > You are referring to the spamassassin trusted_networks, not postfix, right? 127.0.0.1 is in trusted_networks by default. The mail didn't hit ALL_TRUSTED in your spamassassin, only in MailCleaner on sending network. -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. WinError #98652: Operation completed successfully.
