On Fri, 2009-07-03 at 10:06 +0100, Justin Mason wrote: > I've heard that they are diligent about terminating abusive clients. > Are you reporting these spams to them? > Yes - but you would thing a log full of 550's may be a clue.
What concerns me is SpamAssassin effectively white listing spammers. White listing should be a user option - not something added in a nefarious manner. At least it is clear to see with Spamassassin which is a plus - but I cannot pretend that I am not disappointed to find a whitelisted 'spammer net' in the core rules. I'm wondering why (other than MONEY) it would have ended up in there?
