On Thu, 2009-07-02 at 10:43 +0400, Trushin Igor wrote: > use_bayes 1 > bayes_min_ham_num 10 > bayes_min_spam_num 20
> -100 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP > 1.3 MISSING_SUBJECT Missing Subject: header 50_scores.cf: score MISSING_SUBJECT 2.307 1.285 2.476 1.762 SA 3.2.5 stock scores. So you are using score-set 1, network tests enabled, but Bayes DISABLED. Forgot to restart your spamd daemon? Well, or you just did not yet learn sufficient ham and spam beyond your (incredible low) thresholds, so you are not using score-set 3 with Bayes. > We see that with -98.7 points and option > "bayes_auto_learn_threshold_nonspam -10", > but "autolearn=no". Why? 20_compensate.cf: tflags ALL_TRUSTED nice userconf tflags userconf rules are ignored for auto-learning [1]. Thus, as far as the AutoLearnThreshold plugin is concerned, the message scored 1.285, which is not below your auto-learn ham threshold. Also note, that auto-learning uses a non-Bayes score-set internally for training decisions, which is either score-set 0 or 1 -- coincidentally in this case, what has been used anyway. guenther [1] http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.2.x/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Plugin_AutoLearnThreshold.html -- char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu...@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4"; main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1: (c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
