On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 18:26 +0200, Benny Pedersen wrote: > On Wed, July 1, 2009 08:50, rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote: > > > I'm going to need to disable some of these lists as the MTA has already > > blocked stuff on them Kind of pointless making repeat lookups for stuff > > already tested. Thanks for pointing that out Benny. > > pleasde do your home work again !, when you disable some of that rbl testing in sa, more spam will not being cought since mta can > only check client ip, but sa checks all recieved ips :) I never said that it would Benny. Where have I said that? All that I have said is I don't want to waste the DNS round trip. I'm not interested in the other hops. Once it is in SpamAssassin it's in the network anyway. Dress it up as you like but all it will end up with is a 'Spam' tag. > > if you think it does to much checking add more trusted_networks, msa_networks > > its not that hard is it ? What R E A D I N G W H A T I **ACTUALLY** S A I D no, that's easy. Most kids learn it at school. > > back to my c64 in my nokia e51 :)
You may want to upgrade those. Or did you misread the ads for them thinking P64 and N91? You may want to fix that backscatter problem you have too :-)
