On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 11:11 +0200, Per Jessen wrote:
> rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 08:58 +0200, Yet Another Ninja wrote:
> >> On 7/1/2009 8:50 AM, rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote:
> >>   > Oh, and look: dnsbl.sorbs.net
> >> > 
> >> > So it seems that the demise of sorbs will add latency if their
> >> > servers stop answering...
> >> 
> >> 
> >> See "Update: 25th June 2009 "
> >> 
> >> http://www.au.sorbs.net/
> > 
> > Still looks ominous to me. If you consider 'outage' = 'latency'.
> > 
> > I'm guessing there is some way to modify the network checks to it does
> > not use specific RBL's. I've not studied closely, but I think today I
> > need to become acquainted with it.
> 
> Adjust their scores to 0, that should do it.
> 
> 
> /Per Jessen, Zürich
> 
But will that *stop* the lookup in the first place?

Reply via email to